What will Odysseas Michaelides ultimately decide to do? Will he get involved in politics? Will he establish a political movement or party? Will he run as a candidate for a political party in the parliamentary elections? Will he seek a seat as an independent candidate?
Why are these scenarios being mentioned? The answer is that various individuals and supporters of his work have approached Odysseas Michaelides, but as philenews has been reliably informed, none of these scenarios are likely to materialise.
According to the same well-informed sources, the only scenario that Odysseas Michaelides is leaving open is running for the presidency of the Republic in 2028. However, this decision will be made when the time comes.
Why, then, is Odysseas Michaelides not entering the political arena despite the encouragement he receives from people who truly admire him or others who support him simply because of the stance he took while serving as the Auditor General, particularly in the fight against corruption? Many of these individuals suggest that his involvement in politics (in one way or another) would keep him in the spotlight.
According to philenews sources, Odysseas Michaelides realises that his supporters, who have backed him in various situations, come from different political backgrounds.
Therefore, he does not want to divide them or put them in a difficult position, at least not at this moment, given that he is not “living and dying” to become a party leader or participate in a political movement or party.
Additionally, he is not interested in running for a parliamentary seat.
Considering that he needs time to resolve professional matters and adjust to the new circumstances, he is expected to ask for the understanding of his supporters, assuring them that he will make his decisions when the right time comes.
Based on the above, his involvement in politics is solely related to the 2028 presidential elections.
Until then, he does not rule out making some appearances, engaging in certain activities, and generally maintaining a political (not partisan) presence in the country’s affairs.
Moreover, he is open to participating in discussions on issues he dealt with as Auditor General or other matters he is familiar with, as well as topics of common interest.
In another development, Odysseas Michaelides is considering the option of appealing to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), although it is acknowledged that the process is not straightforward, as there is no room for an appeal to examine the substance of the decision.
One option available at the ECHR, which has its difficulties, is for the applicant to invoke “unfair trial.”
One issue that Odysseas Michaelides could potentially argue is that the judges of the Supreme Court and the Attorney General are interconnected.
While this could be understood by citizens and the general public, the question arises as to whether the arguments and evidence presented by Odysseas Michaelides can be legally accepted by the ECHR, even if they clearly point in a specific direction.
In this case, the issue of an impartial court would be raised. Legal experts explain that proving such a claim is very difficult.
The second option concerns the censorship that arises from the decision. Specifically, in almost all the chapters examined by the Court, there are references to statements, expressions, letters, etc. by Odysseas Michaelides that were taken into consideration to “substantiate” his inappropriate behaviour.
By appealing to the ECHR, Odysseas Michaelides primarily aims to prove indirectly that the treatment he received was destructive and to obtain moral satisfaction. Financial compensation is not his main concern.
Read more:
